About BC SEA Get Involved Activities Chapters Publications Policy Events
Climate Change Sustainable Energy Energy Efficiency Transport Education


Events

Jobs & Contracts

Sustainable
Energy Directory

Email Lists

Links

Contact Us

Tell a Friend

Sponsors

Site Map

Fact of the Month

Quote/Unquote:

"An alternative, clean energy plan is doable. It's sensible. It's sustainable. And we need to get on with it, urgently."
- Guy Dauncey

 

Media Release
For Immediate Release April 5, 2005
(PDF, 428kb)

Environment groups ask BC Court to halt Duke Point project

Vancouver – A coalition of BC Hydro environmental groups is asking the BC Court of Appeal to halt construction of a gas-fired power plant on Vancouver Island.

In the same proceeding, an a coalition of heavy industrial electricity users also will file an application for leave to appeal the BC Utilities Commission decision to approve BC Hydro’s 2004 electricity purchase agreement with Duke Point Power Limited.

The GSX Concerned Citizen Coalition (GSXCCC), the BC Sustainable Energy Association (BCSEA) and the Society Promoting Environmental Conservation (SPEC) say that the 265 MW gas-fired generation plant at Duke Point near Nanaimo commits BC Hydro to fossil fuel-based electricity generation rather than clean energy projects.

“ BC Hydro’s plan to commit to more gas-fired electricity essentially would stifle any serious commitment to non-polluting, sustainable energy,” said GSXCCC president Tom Hackney. “Gas-fired electricity is not the best way to a secure electricity supply for Vancouver Island. This plant would expose consumers to volatile gas prices for the next 25 years, and it would cost ratepayers $35 million per year whether it runs or not.”

“ Canada's One Tonne Challenge asks each of Vancouver Island’s 750,000 residents to reduce their annual greenhouse gas emissions by one tonne,” noted BCSEA president Guy Dauncey. “The Duke Point plant would increase it by one tonne—exactly the wrong direction. We should be developing green, sustainable energy, not dirty brown energy.”

SPEC executive director Karen Wristen believes that the project makes no sense in a post-Kyoto world. “Decision-makers at every level need to look seriously at incorporating our nation commitment to greenhouse gas reduction when they review projects, and to consider the long-term implications of power generation methods.”

The Duke Point plant would release some 850,000 tonnes of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere every year – as much 180,000 cars – and increase BC’s total annual emissions by one percent. It also would harm local air quality, affecting residents’ health.

The BC Utilities Commission’s decision to approve the electricity purchase agreement was issued 17 February, one day after the Kyoto Protocol entered into legal force around the world. Under the Protocol, Canada is committed to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by six percent below 1990 levels by the period of 2008 to 2012.

The joint application by GSXCCC, BC SEA, and SPEC claims there is a “reasonable apprehension of bias” in the way the Utilities Commission reviewed the Duke Point electricity purchase agreement. Specifically, claim sttates that the BCUC panel made up its mind to approve the plant before having heard all the evidence in the review.

Parties will gather at the provincial court house on Wednesday, 6 April at 800 Smithe Street, Vancouver, at 9:30 a.m., when the motion for leave to appeal will be heard. For more information, contact:

Thomas Hackney, GSXCCC | Guy Dauncey, BC SEA | Karen Wristen, SPEC
(250) 381-4463 | (250) 881-1304 | (604) 736-7732